Payá Pérez, A. and Peláez Sánchez, S. (eds.) (2017) European achievements in soil remediation and brownfield redevelopment. EUR 27814 EN, JRC102681. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. doi:10.2760/818120.
This JRC collection anchors the language of transformation in the uneven, material histories of contaminated European sites. Its case structure spans national regulatory circumstances, actual remediation technologies, legacy industries and redevelopment programmes, including examples from Belgium, Finland, France, Hungary, Italy, Poland, Spain and the United Kingdom. The report makes contamination legible as a variable that changes the available future rather than as a decorative symbol of urban abandonment. Technical feasibility, public investment, risk to health, regulatory capacities and subsequent land use do not align automatically. The juxtaposition of national experiences reveals a second complication: a European method may share a vocabulary while its permissions, remediation thresholds, liability and costs remain jurisdictionally situated. The document bridges geoscience, engineering, environmental health, landscape reconstruction and public administration; its strongest operation is material constraint. A spatial proposal that has not established what can be touched, occupied, removed or left undisturbed cannot yet claim to be reversible, participatory or publicly beneficial. For The Waiting City it demands an explicit difference between a research inventory and a site capable of implementation. For HoodKnows it is a useful counterweight to treating environmental quality as a perceptual matter alone: lived experience can challenge an indicator, but it cannot annul documented toxic exposure or specialist safety thresholds.
European Commission, CORDIS (2014) TIMBRE: An integrated framework of methods, technologies, tools and policies for improvement of brownfield regeneration in Europe. Final report summary, grant agreement 265364. Brussels: European Commission.
TIMBRE demonstrates that European brownfield regeneration already possesses an unusually developed infrastructure of prioritisation, participatory assessment, technical remediation and integrated information systems. Working across scientific, SME, industrial and regulatory capacities, it assembled tools aimed at overcoming the fragmentation and low visibility of existing approaches. Its Prioritization Tool uses multicriteria methods to allocate attention and resources among sites; its Site Assessment Tool enables invited stakeholders to examine redevelopment options; other components address soil screening, remediation, deconstruction and reuse. The report describes applications in Germany, Poland and Romania and identifies administrative conditions, cultural differences, stakeholder attitudes and trust as consequential to tool uptake. It thereby bridges environmental engineering, spatial planning, information systems and practical institutional governance. The distinct methodological operation is selective coordination: the problem is not simply absence of knowledge but the difficulty of connecting available instruments to the problem owners capable of acting on them. This is also a stringent warning to The Waiting City. Inventory, stakeholder involvement, multicriteria prioritisation and a public web interface are existing capacities, not sufficient claims of novelty. The proposed advance must be tested at the point where a conventional remediation-oriented priority conflicts with a currently unrecognised ecological, social or temporal value, and where the decision record makes the conflict consequential rather than merely visible.
Haasnoot, M., Kwakkel, J.H., Walker, W.E. and ter Maat, J. (2013) ‘Dynamic adaptive policy pathways: A method for crafting robust decisions for a deeply uncertain world’, Global Environmental Change, 23(2), pp. 485–498. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.12.006.
Haasnoot and colleagues displace planning from the selection of a supposedly optimal future to the design of sequences able to change when circumstances make current measures inadequate. Their Dynamic Adaptive Policy Pathways approach joins Adaptive Policymaking, with its monitored signposts and triggers, to Adaptation Pathways, which maps alternative actions and their possible transitions. An adaptation tipping point is neither the end of a predetermined programme nor a forecast date; it marks a condition under which an action ceases to meet its stated objectives. The Rhine Delta application gives the method an environmental-management demonstration rather than leaving it as a philosophical metaphor for flexibility. The operation is temporal qualification: a decision is specified together with the conditions that would require its alteration and the routes through which alteration can occur. This bridges decision theory, infrastructure planning, policy evaluation and environmental governance. For The Waiting City the paper is a direct methodological predecessor, not a supporting citation for an allegedly new invention of adaptive planning. Any proposed Waiting Grammar must explain what is added by parcel-specific property authority, informal current use, ecological succession, culturally contested value, full-chain material exit and the right to challenge who establishes the decision horizon. The novel unit, if established, is not the adaptive pathway alone but a situated, rights-bearing decision whose premises remain revisable.
European Commission, Joint Research Centre (2024) A practical guide to the New European Bauhaus self-assessment method and tool. Edited by K. Gkatzogias, E. Romano and P. Negro. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. doi:10.2760/9581060.
The New European Bauhaus self-assessment guide is not merely an inventory of good design principles. It supplies a hierarchical apparatus through which heterogeneous qualities of the built environment become assessable without being collapsed into a final universal mark. Sustainability, Beauty and Inclusiveness are represented through indicators, key performance indicators and dimensions, adjustable for building, neighbourhood and urban scales and for new construction and renovation. Especially consequential is the refusal to calculate one global score combining the three dimensions: conflict between qualities is preserved at the level where improvements must be negotiated. Beauty includes sensory experience, safety, heritage and cultural acceptance rather than appearance alone; inclusion incorporates accessibility, affordability and social relations. The method therefore bridges engineering assessment, architectural judgement, environmental performance and situated public experience. Its limitation is also productive: indicators can establish accountable descriptions, yet the guide cannot by itself guarantee that locally measured conditions match the experience of particular moving inhabitants, or decide what to do when otherwise valid dimensions favour incompatible futures. For HoodKnows it provides an indispensable comparator, not an empty methodological space to occupy. For The Waiting City it demonstrates why a defensible decision cannot be reduced to a single composite index. The intellectual operation is calibrated non-equivalence: qualities become comparable without becoming interchangeable.
Planning time is not the interval between a proposal and a decision. It is an organised distribution of opportunities to know, revise, contest, wait and commit. Calendar duration matters, but it does not explain the process. Two plans can occupy the same number of months while producing entirely different institutional sequences: one may allow decisive knowledge to enter early, another may accumulate unresolved dependencies until revision becomes costly. Organized time names the architecture through which planning transforms uncertainty into commitment.
The distinction between time and temporality is therefore fundamental. Clock time measures duration; temporality describes the ordering, tempo and timing of events. A meeting held before a design hardens is not equivalent to the same meeting held after land, finance and political commitments are fixed. Sequence alters causal capacity. The planning process is path-dependent because every decision changes what remains revisable, and because the cost of change increases as actors accumulate sunk commitments. This makes delay a political rather than purely administrative category. Some intervals add no information and merely reproduce fragmentation; others allow environmental knowledge, negotiation or public scrutiny to enter. Productive and pathological delay cannot be identified by duration alone. They must be distinguished by what an interval changes: whether it resolves uncertainty, broadens legitimacy, preserves reversibility or simply transfers cost to another actor. The temporal politics of planning also concerns unequal capacities to wait. Institutions, developers, residents and consultants do not experience delay symmetrically. One actor may absorb months as portfolio risk while another experiences the same period as existential uncertainty. Acceleration can therefore redistribute power as effectively as regulation. Compressing consultation, advancing a decision or postponing infrastructure does not merely alter the schedule; it reallocates opportunity and exposure. For Socioplastics, organized time enables planning documents to be read as event structures rather than as static artefacts. A corpus can register when a requirement appeared, which actor introduced it, what uncertainty it resolved and what later decisions it made possible or impossible. Such a sequence turns the archive into a temporal instrument: not a repository of completed objects but a record of how alternatives close, reopen and acquire institutional weight. Organized time adds to Socioplastics a temporal grammar of causality. It makes duration secondary to sequence, and transforms planning history from a line of dates into an operational map of when knowledge, authority and irreversibility enter the field.
Latham, A. and Layton, J. (2019) ‘Social infrastructure and the public life of cities: Studying urban sociality and public spaces’, Geography Compass, 13, e12444. https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12444.
Latham and Layton develop social infrastructure as a research framework for recognising the public dimensions of spaces that are routinely overlooked because their primary function appears mundane. Libraries, laundrettes, cafés, playgrounds, swimming pools, pavements and schools matter not only for what they formally provide but for the social capacities their material and institutional arrangements make possible. The article’s central contribution is to connect infrastructure, publicness, encounter and provision within one analytic language. Its methodological operation is infrastructural rather than typological: the question is not whether a place is officially public, but how its design, accessibility, routines, conventions and maintenance support repeated forms of co-presence, trust and connection. Drawing on Star, Klinenberg and traditions of public-space research, infrastructure becomes relational, embedded and often visible most clearly when it breaks down. This produces a precise bridge between urban geography and microsociology: collective life is sustained by ordinary settings whose social effects are distributed through repeated use rather than spectacular civic form.
Samuelsson, K. (2021) ‘The Topodiverse City: Urban Form for Subjective Well-Being’, Frontiers in Built Environment, 7, 735221. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2021.735221
Samuelsson reframes urban quality as diversity of spatial opportunity rather than optimisation around one ideal morphology. Topodiversity names variation in spatial conditions across an urban area sufficient to support multiple pathways to subjective well-being: movement, access, social and economic activity, restorative experience and ecological performance. The argument is deliberately synthetic, drawing urban morphology, complex-systems thinking, environmental psychology and neuroscience into a model in which polycentricity and spatial containment can coexist without collapsing into either sprawl or maximal compactness. Its methodological operation is to translate a theoretical urban form into measurable principles and indicators, many based on openly available spatial data. The work therefore bridges normative planning and empirical urban science: it does not simply recommend “more nature” or “more density”, but asks how patterned variation in urban form can preserve choice, affordance and adaptation while reducing environmental cost. Topodiversity makes heterogeneity itself an urban resource.
Bryer, B., Odebeatu, C.C., Lee, W.R., Vitangcol, K., Gallegos-Rejas, V., Osborne, N.J., Williams, G. and Darssan, D. (2025) ‘Greenspace exposure and associated health outcomes: a systematic review of reviews’, F1000Research, 13, 491, version 2. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.148878.2
Bryer and colleagues examine greenspace not through a single outcome but through an umbrella review of 36 systematic reviews and meta-analyses published between 2010 and 2020. The key intellectual contribution lies in refusing a uniformly beneficial narrative: mortality, mental health and cognitive function show broadly favourable associations, while cardiovascular, metabolic, respiratory, general-health and quality-of-life outcomes remain more ambivalent, and much of the underlying review literature carries low-to-moderate methodological quality and high risk of bias. Their methodological operation is therefore double: synthesize a very large evidence field while auditing the quality of the syntheses themselves. This exposes the gap between policy enthusiasm for greenery and the uneven epistemic strength of different health claims. The wider bridge is to evidence-based urbanism: greenspace can be treated as public-health infrastructure only when exposure measures, outcome definitions, causal assumptions and review quality remain visible rather than being compressed into a generic claim that “green is good”.
Zhang, W., Ahmad Termida, N. and Susilo, Y.O. (2019) ‘What construct one’s familiar area? A quantitative and longitudinal study’, Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 46(2), pp. 322–340. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399808317714798
Zhang, Ahmad Termida and Susilo treat spatial familiarity as a dynamic field rather than a static mental map. Using four waves of two-week travel diaries and mapped familiar areas collected over seven months from 55 participants in Stockholm, they digitise subjective familiarity into quantifiable spatial data and analyse change through dynamic binary probit and linear regression models. Their central finding is conceptually important: familiar area is strongly conditioned by previous knowledge, yet it is continuously corrected by intervening events and differentiated by land-use characteristics and social group. Familiarity therefore has temporal inertia without being fixed. The methodological operation bridges cognition and mobility by coupling reported mental geography with repeated activity patterns, making it possible to observe how spatial knowledge expands, contracts or reorganises. The wider field implication is that urban exposure accumulates unevenly: places become cognitively available through recurrence, but the resulting familiar city remains selective, socially differentiated and open to revision.
Liu, S., Ho, H.C. and Wilson, J.P. (2025) ‘Effects of urban green space on human cognition: A systematic search and scoping review’, Urban Climate, 60, 102372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2025.102372
Liu, Ho and Wilson reorganise the green-space–cognition problem around three pathways: functional, spatial and perceptual. Their scoping review identifies 37 relevant studies, distinguishing direct modelling of mechanisms from indirect inference and showing that air-pollution reduction and physical activity dominate the current evidence base, while heat reduction and social interaction remain comparatively underexamined. The paper’s strongest methodological critique concerns spatial resolution: arbitrary buffer zones and moderate-resolution greenness measures can obscure street-level differences and the actual forms of exposure through which cognition may be affected. Street-view imagery, local climate zones and finer-grained urban data are therefore proposed not as technological upgrades in themselves, but as ways to better align environmental measurement with functional experience. The broader contribution is a bridge between exposure science, cognition and urban morphology: “green space” becomes analytically insufficient unless its type, spatial configuration, perceptual availability and mechanism of action are differentiated.
Christensen, R., Constable Fernandez, C., Topalian, N., Vaughan, L., Krenz, K., Pitman, A. and Fett, A.-K. (2025) ‘A systematic review of geographically informed ecological momentary assessment studies on the place-based correlates of mental health, substance use and wellbeing’, Landscape and Urban Planning, 264, 105487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2025.105487
Christensen and colleagues place environmental exposure inside lived time. Their review of 33 geographically informed ecological momentary assessment studies examines how GPS, GIS, mobile sensing and momentary self-report can connect specific places with mental health, wellbeing and substance use as experience unfolds. The methodological innovation is not simply mobility tracking, but the synchronisation of spatial context and psychological state in ways designed to reduce retrospective bias and increase ecological validity. Eleven studies focused on natural environments, nineteen on built-environment characteristics and three on ambient conditions, yet temporal associations remain comparatively underdeveloped despite the method’s longitudinal potential. The paper thus identifies a critical frontier: exposure cannot be reduced to residential buffers or static neighbourhood attributes when people move through changing environments during the day. Its wider bridge links environmental psychology, urban analytics and mobile methods, recasting place as a time-dependent exposure relation rather than a fixed container around residence.
Sturm, V.E. et al. (2022) ‘Big Smile, Small Self: Awe Walks Promote Prosocial Positive Emotions in Older Adults’, Emotion, 22(5), pp. 1044–1058. doi:10.1037/emo0000876.
Sturm and colleagues operationalise awe as a repeated practice rather than a singular exceptional event. Sixty healthy older adults were randomly assigned to weekly fifteen-minute awe walks or control walks for eight weeks, with emotional reports, daily surveys and photographs recorded throughout. The study’s striking result is that awe did not necessarily diminish through repetition: participants completing more awe walks showed larger gains in awe, joy and prosocial positive emotion. Photographs became behavioural evidence, with self-size and smile intensity used to track the “small self” and positive affect across time. Methodologically, the design connects intervention, recurrence and visual data in a compact longitudinal structure. The work bridges emotion research, environmental exposure and social connection, while revealing an important distinction between momentary and persistent effects: awe itself remained context-bound, whereas prosocial affect showed more durable accumulation. Repetition therefore transforms emotional experience without requiring simple habituation or monotonic decline.
Cheng, S., Lei, B., Fujiwara, K., Miller, C., Biljecki, F. and van Ameijde, J. (2026) ‘Walking through Green and Grey: Exploring Sequential Exposure and Multisensory Environmental Effects on Psychological Restoration’, Building and Environment, 287, 113748. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2025.113748.
Cheng and colleagues replace static green-versus-grey comparisons with sequential exposure, treating restoration as a process that unfolds while bodies move through changing environments. Twenty participants walked grey–green–grey routes while restoration was tracked through pre/post psychometrics, heart-rate variability and minute-level micro-surveys. The study’s key empirical proposition is temporal carry-over: green exposure produced a short-term “inoculation effect” whose restorative benefit persisted after participants re-entered grey settings. Visual features were the strongest predictors, followed by noise and microclimate. Methodologically, the work is important because it decomposes a walk into temporally ordered environmental transitions rather than treating a route as one exposure unit. It bridges environmental psychology, spatial sensing, physiological measurement and computational interpretation. More broadly, it demonstrates that environment–experience relations possess memory: what a person encounters now partly conditions how the next setting is experienced, making sequence itself an analytical variable.
Paiva, D., Mantey, D., Silva, M., Ferreira, D., Boavida-Portugal, I. and Cachinho, H. (2025) ‘Introducing biosensing techniques in urban geography fieldwork activities with students’, Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 49(4), pp. 496–512. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2025.2521256
Paiva et al. use biosensing to expose the body as both an evidential instrument and a source of methodological instability in urban fieldwork. Working with students in Warsaw and Cuiabá, the study examines electrodermal activity as a means of registering physiological reactions during movement through urban space. Its most productive finding is not that biodata objectively resolves subjective experience, but that physiological traces become meaningful only when reconnected to location, time, event and interpretation. Students repeatedly identified the need to couple biosensing with GPS, video and contextual observation because urban environments present simultaneous stimuli that resist simple causal attribution. Different climates, morphologies and participant characteristics further complicate standardisation. The conceptual operation therefore reverses technological determinism: sensing does not eliminate situated interpretation but intensifies the need for it. The paper connects urban geography to environmental psychology and mobile methods by showing that body–environment relations require multimodal evidence architectures in which physiological resolution and contextual explanation remain mutually constraining.
Falahat, S. (2024) ‘Co-producing theory: Epistemic tyrannies of urban conversations’, Dialogues in Urban Research, 2(3), pp. 364–368. https://doi.org/10.1177/27541258241296106
Falahat shifts comparative urbanism from the circulation of cases to the politics governing the terms under which urban knowledge becomes intelligible. Her central claim is that a plural urban conversation cannot be produced simply by adding geographically diverse examples to an epistemic framework whose categories remain historically Eurocentric. The operative distinction is between the content of a conversation and its terms: assumptions, vocabularies, institutions and representational infrastructures determine which forms of knowledge can appear as theory and which must first be translated into an already dominant language. She therefore calls for historically and culturally grounded co-production in which local archives, concepts, cosmologies and modes of thought enter urban theory with their own genealogies intact. Methodologically, comparison becomes inseparable from epistemic location and representational power. The paper’s wider bridge is to decolonial geography: a genuinely comparative urbanism must examine not only differences between cities, but the unequal infrastructures through which some urban experiences acquire universal theoretical status.
Urban form is never produced by a single rule, yet it is never free from rules. What planning governs most effectively is not the final shape of the city but the field within which shape can emerge. A limit on height, a minimum open-space ratio, a floor-area ceiling or a street-width requirement does not contain an architectural solution. Each creates a boundary condition. The built environment appears through the intersection of these conditions with property, finance, design practice, infrastructure and precedent. The relevant object is therefore neither regulation nor form in isolation, but feasible form: the changing set of spatial configurations that remain possible as rules accumulate and interact.
This shift displaces deterministic accounts of planning. Moroni’s distinction between teleocratic and nomocratic regulation clarifies why a rule cannot be read simply as a command toward a desired image. General rules can structure action without specifying an end-state, while discretionary planning can seek outcomes through case-specific steering. Both nevertheless alter the range of spatial possibilities. Regulation acts morphologically when it changes that range: when one option becomes impossible, another more advantageous, or a previously indifferent relation between footprint, height and access becomes decisive. Spacematrix gives feasible form a measurable topology. Density ceases to be a scalar and becomes a multidimensional configuration in which built intensity, coverage and network structure interact. Under the same nominal density, radically different fabrics remain available. This is more than a technical refinement. It means that regulation operates in a space of alternatives rather than along a single quantitative axis. A planning parameter does not merely add or subtract capacity; it reshapes the geometry of the solution field. The Nanjing evidence demonstrates that such effects can be observed historically. Plot indicators, building-density controls and block regulations leave traces in subdivision, massing and street-block structure, yet those traces remain mediated by developer response and broader urban transformation. Feasible form is therefore probabilistic rather than deterministic. Its analytical value lies precisely in the capacity to distinguish strong constraints from weak influence, and direct morphological effects from those routed through other institutional or economic mechanisms. For Socioplastics, feasible form offers an operational way to connect institutional language with spatial evidence. Regulations, plans, diagrams, massing studies and built outcomes can be archived as successive states of one constrained field. The archive no longer records only what was built; it can register what became possible, what was excluded and which combinations of rules produced each narrowing. This makes the regulatory environment observable as a material and epistemic infrastructure. Feasible form adds to Socioplastics a grammar of constrained possibility: a way of treating rules not as static texts but as active delimiters of spatial variation, and morphology not as a finished object but as the visible residue of successive institutional selections.
Urban attachment is not the opposite of urban transformation. It can be produced by transformation, intensified through novelty, commodified through representation and distributed unevenly across social groups. A neighbourhood under gentrifying and touristifying pressure can simultaneously generate new attachments, weaken established ones and convert older attachments into marketable signs of authenticity. The decisive conceptual shift is therefore from attachment as a stable bond to attachment as an ambivalent urban process. People do not attach to an abstract neighbourhood but to recurrent routes, recognisable interiors, familiar staff, specific atmospheres, sensory cues, social permissions and remembered uses. When these relations change, attachment does not simply disappear. It can migrate, fragment, intensify, become nostalgic, or re-form around new environments.
This ambivalence has an epistemic consequence. Neither “traditional” nor “new” can function as an explanatory category by itself. A long-established café can become a destination for tourists and participate in the symbolic revaluation of a street; a recently opened specialty coffee bar can become a recurrent meeting place and produce genuine familiarity, social recognition and place dependence for nearby residents. What matters is the configuration linking person, process and place: who uses the setting, through which practices, under what economic conditions, and with what degree of access, continuity and recognition. The same material environment can therefore support attachment for one group while producing exclusion or loss for another. Attachment must be analysed relationally, not assigned morally to particular aesthetic styles. Commercial space becomes politically significant because it operates as social infrastructure and as a carrier of value. Cafés can support weak ties, tolerated solitude, repeated encounter and informal publicness, yet they also participate in rent dynamics, consumer distinction and neighbourhood branding. Their social usefulness does not place them outside political economy. On the contrary, their capacity to generate atmosphere, familiarity and perceived authenticity can increase the desirability of streets and districts. The infrastructural and gentrifying functions are not mutually exclusive; they can reinforce one another. A successful café may simultaneously stabilise everyday sociability and contribute to a commercial ecology that raises rents, changes clienteles and alters the symbolic ownership of the neighbourhood.
Planning value is not captured when money changes hands; it is captured when an increase in economic possibility is converted into a durable public capacity. Development rights, infrastructure, landownership and municipal action can all increase the value of land, but the political question begins only after that increase becomes identifiable. What portion is private return, what portion can be redirected, through which mechanism, and into what form of collective benefit? Value conversion names this passage from uplift to outcome.
The distinction between land rent and land value capture reveals why the object is unstable. One tradition observes the whole field of urban land value and asks how rent should be taxed or distributed; another focuses on increments associated with planning decisions and infrastructure. Both depend on a theory of causation. Value cannot be captured fairly unless institutions can explain which part of an increase is socially produced, which is attributable to location or scarcity, and which emerges from private investment and risk. Yet conversion is never purely fiscal. Governmentality analysis shows that the calculations used to represent value are themselves instruments of governance. Residual valuations, land prices, infrastructure budgets and feasibility models translate heterogeneous qualities into commensurable figures. These technologies make action possible, but they also exclude what cannot be easily priced. Social, ecological and aesthetic values enter redevelopment only when institutions construct channels through which they can survive financial calculation. Public land development offers one such channel. Municipal ownership can connect land allocation to developer obligations, sustainability criteria, collaboration and learning. It can transform the land transaction into a platform for defining desired public outcomes. The Swedish cases demonstrate that this capacity reaches beyond infrastructure provision, while also exposing a conceptual problem: not every public benefit can be traced to a discrete increment of captured value. Public value is wider than value capture. Place quality makes this tension explicit. The comparative evidence from Scotland, the Netherlands and Germany shows that planning systems and land-policy strategies affect whether uplift can be channelled into public realm and placemaking. Active land policy can internalise quality costs earlier and reduce uncertainty, but no instrument guarantees durability. The decisive analytical question becomes not simply what is captured, but what the captured value becomes and whether that outcome persists. For Socioplastics, value conversion makes finance, regulation, land, design and maintenance readable within one infrastructural chain. A corpus can follow the movement from development right to valuation, from valuation to obligation, from obligation to spatial outcome, and from outcome to long-term maintenance or erosion. This is stronger than treating value as a monetary category because it makes conversion itself observable. Value conversion adds to Socioplastics a political economy of transformation: a method for tracing how institutional decisions turn abstract uplift into concrete public conditions, and where that transformation succeeds, leaks or disappears.
Pooley, C.G., Jones, T., Jones, H., Spencer, B. and Chatterjee, K. (2018) ‘Family formation and everyday travel in Britain since c.1850’, The History of the Family, 23(2), pp. 290–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/1081602X.2017.1417146.
Pooley and colleagues place everyday mobility inside a long historical frame, showing that family formation changes travel practices differently according to available technologies, social norms, risk perceptions and gendered responsibilities. Their evidence combines travel life histories with historical diaries, allowing routine movement to be analysed across more than a century without reducing mobility to spectacular journeys. The article’s key contribution is the insistence that ordinary travel is historically variable: walking, cycling, public transport and car dependence are shaped not only by infrastructure but by changing expectations about care, safety, time and appropriate behaviour. Methodologically, qualitative life histories recover decisions and constraints that aggregate travel statistics cannot explain, while the authors explicitly acknowledge the limits of retrospective testimony. The wider bridge is to mobilities history: everyday routes become social evidence, revealing how family, technology and cultural norms reorganise spatial practice over generations.
Albrecht, J., Holz-Rau, C. and Scheiner, J. (2017) ‘Life-course data reconstruction using complementary information taken from linked lives’, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 104, pp. 308–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2017.03.016.
Albrecht, Holz-Rau and Scheiner address a central weakness of retrospective research: parts of early life are inaccessible to the person whose biography is being reconstructed. Their solution is to treat linked lives as an evidential resource, using parents’ and grandparents’ accounts to reconstruct residential biographies and then testing those reconstructions against respondents’ own reports. The method reframes memory as distributed rather than sovereign. A childhood trajectory can be partially recovered because family members shared residences, decisions and temporal episodes even when the child did not consciously register them. The study also shows that reconstruction quality varies by relationship and variable, so supplementary testimony cannot simply be treated as factual replacement. Its wider contribution is methodological and epistemic: longitudinal biography becomes a multi-source reconstruction problem, linking mobility research to relational sociology, intergenerational transmission and evidential triangulation across partially overlapping lives.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)