Paul formulates environmental justice as a constitutive principle of technological design rather than an external ethical review. The iconic contribution is the Environmental Justice in Technology framework, which foregrounds interdependence, repair, community self-determination and regeneration against innovation models organised by speed, scale and profit. The theoretical advance lies in refusing to treat mining, energy use, data centres, labour, surveillance and waste as peripheral externalities; they are integral to what technological systems are and whom they serve. Methodologically, the paper translates movement-based environmental justice commitments into a values infrastructure for design, governance and collective assessment. Its conceptual operation is regenerative reorientation: the criteria of technological success shift from expansion and efficiency to reciprocity, redistribution and long-term ecological viability. The wider bridge reaches design justice, post-growth computing, Indigenous data sovereignty and STS. Technology becomes a political ecology whose purposes, processes and ownership must be transformed together, not merely made less harmful at the level of individual products.