Say a word often enough inside a single argument and it starts to attract surrounding meanings into its own semantic orbit — its sense has not necessarily become more precise, only harder to dislodge from the shape repetition has given it. Terms that begin as flexible, exploratory coinages can therefore calcify into jargon: still functional within the group that uses them, but increasingly resistant to the redefinition that first made them useful. WordMagnet names this accumulation of semantic force and the risk it creates for any theoretical vocabulary that depends on revision to remain honest. A term without recurrence cannot build cumulative thought; a term with too much gravitational force stops learning from its own use.
Daston, L. and Galison, P. (2007) Objectivity. New York: Zone Books.
Foucault, M. (1977) 'What is an Author?', in Language, Counter-Memory, Practice. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, pp. 113-138.
Bowker, G.C. (1994) Science on the Run: Information Management and Industrial Geophysics at Schlumberger, 1920-1940. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Collins, R. (1998) The Sociology of Philosophies: A Global Theory of Intellectual Change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Crane, D. (1972) Invisible Colleges: Diffusion of Knowledge in Scientific Communities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.