SOCIOPLASTICS articulates itself not as a discourse but as an epistemic infrastructure: a scaffold where knowledge is neither accumulated nor displayed, but hardened. Its ambition is not representation but immunity. Within this system, citation ceases to function as a derivative gesture and becomes an act of structural alignment, embedding the subject into a mesh that resists dispersion while remaining metabolically adaptive. This is not an archive; it is a vault whose coherence is maintained through semantic rigor rather than narrative continuity. Two forces govern it: epistemic sovereignty and semantic hardening. Citation here is never ornamental. It is a performative incision that binds the citer to the form they activate. At the core of this operation lies the notion of a mesh understood not metaphorically but procedurally. The mesh is not a network of references; it is a protocol that regulates legibility, authority, and transmission. To cite is to situate oneself within this topology, accepting its constraints as productive rather than limiting. The act of reference thus becomes a mode of governance, ensuring that meaning circulates without dissolving. This produces a condition of protocolual sovereignty sustained by topological coherence.