Within Socioplastics, the topology of meaning designates the spatial organisation through which interpretation is produced, circulated and constrained. It is not a strictly mathematical topology, but a non-Euclidean epistemological model in which meaning emerges through borders, gradients, habitats, exclusions and passages. Interpretation is therefore neither universal nor exclusively mental; it is territorially constituted by linguistic, institutional, material and corporeal arrangements that determine what becomes intelligible, plausible or actionable. Operators such as InterpretationTerritory identify bounded fields of legibility, while SyntacticEdge and UncertaintyPassage mark transitional zones where existing grammars may collapse or generate new forms. GenealogyGradient describes variable proximity to inherited sources and structures of legitimacy; DistinctionHabitat explains how conceptual differences become normalised environments; and ReasonExterior names what must remain excluded for a territory to preserve internal coherence. This topology also possesses an embodied dimension: AtmospherePosture, ErrorEmbodiment and WalkableWisdom reveal how meaning regulates bodily dispositions, spatial behaviour and cognitive accessibility. A curatorial exhibition offers a precise case study: through selection, sequencing, architecture and explanatory framing, it constructs an interpretative territory in which certain relationships become visible while others remain peripheral or inaccessible. Epistemologically, this model rejects Cartesian interiority and universalist abstraction; philosophically, it resonates with Foucauldian power–knowledge, Deleuzian territorialisation and situated hermeneutics. Its decisive contribution lies in treating limits as both restrictive and generative. Socioplastics thus transforms meaning into an inhabitable architecture that can be mapped, contested, repaired and redesigned.